Proceedings.

Mundo Media Ltd

Follow
Closed
Proceeding
Receivership (court-appointed)BIA s. 243 / prov. Judicature Acts
Court
Ontario Superior Court of Justice · Commercial List
File
CV-19-00617777-00CL
Filings held65
Last activity22 Jun 2026
On the record2,722 days
OverviewSummary updated

Mundo Media Ltd. was placed in court-appointed receivership on April 9, 2019 by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) under section 243 of the BIA, on the application of Royal Bank of Canada, which held general security over the debtor and specific pledges over bank accounts of Mundo Media and affiliated debtors in Luxembourg. The Receiver retained independent counsel, Goldman, Sloan, Nash & Haber LLP, to opine on the validity and enforceability of RBC's security, assisted RBC in repatriating the pledged Luxembourg funds, and distributed funds to RBC under a reimbursement agreement pending a distribution approval order. Canada Revenue Agency issued a Notice of Assessment on March 25, 2020 asserting a deemed-trust claim of CAD 919,105.72 before penalties and interest under section 165 of the Excise Tax Act, arising from a May 2017 related-party software transaction with subsidiary 2518769 Ontario Ltd. The Receiver objected and filed RC4616 election documentation; CRA still had the matter under consideration. The proceeding is closed.

Proceedings AIAsk this case — answers cite the filings
Ask in plain language. The answer comes only from this case’s filings, each one cited.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for a new line
Case updates65 dated entries

62 earlier updates, back to 9 April 2019 subscribers.

Parties

Debtor

Mundo Media Ltd

Receiver

EY

Bench and counselPer the orders and service lists on the record

Bench

JudgeCourtOn this docketCases on record
Justice PennyOntario Superior Court of Justice3 orders, Apr 2022 – Jun 2024179 cases on record
Justice HaineyOntario Superior Court of Justice3 orders, Oct 2020 – Jan 2021196 cases on record
Justice KimmelOntario Superior Court of Justice2 orders, Jun 2026182 cases on record

Counsel of record

PartyCounselFirst seenSource
ReceiverEYThornton Grout Finnigan LLP18 Feb 2022Factum · 18 Feb 2022
DebtorMundo Media LtdThornton Grout Finnigan LLP3 May 2021Factum · 3 May 2021
CreditorProceedings commenced at TorontoThornton Grout Finnigan LLP9 Apr 2019Order · 9 Apr 2019
CreditorRoyal Bank of CanadaThornton Grout Finnigan LLP30 May 2024Application · 30 May 2024
CreditorsPay, IncLax O'Sullivan Lisus Gottlieb LLP4 Feb 2022Factum · 4 Feb 2022
CreditorVdopia IncClark, Farb, Fiksel22 Oct 2020Factum · 22 Oct 2020
Capital structureAs asserted in the filings
Priority classCreditorAmountSource
Deemed trusts (CRA and other)Canada Revenue Agency · in 928 casesHST/ETA s.165 assessment (before penalties and interest) relating to a May 2017 related-party software transaction with subsidiary 2518769 Ontario Ltd.; deemed-trust class claim; Notice of Assessment issued March 25, 2020; disputed - Receiver filed a Notice of Objection and provided the RC4616 election documentation; matter still under consideration by CRA as of report date. — debtor: Mundo Media Ltd. · as of 4 Dec 2019$919KExhibit Book

This proceeding was commenced by a secured creditor. The record does not include the debtor’s own statement of assets and liabilities — that ceiling is the record’s, not this page’s.

1 more claim across lower-ranking classes

Subscribe

Already a subscriber? Sign in.

RecoveriesAs declared or paid

Unsecured creditors: no recovery. Royal Bank of Canada short.Notice of Motion · 12 Jun 2026

ClassCreditorClaimsRecoveryBasisSource
SecuredRBCRoyal Bank of CanadashortfallFinalper the receiverThird Report of the Receiver (Part 1) · 12 Jun 2026
Unsecuredany creditor other than the Applicantno recoveryper the receiverNotice of Motion · 12 Jun 2026

Each row is one filing's statement, copied as it reads and never computed. "Estimated" is the officer's forecast; "Under the plan" is the plan's or proposal's own term; "Final" is a declared or paid distribution; a row with no chip states no footing. A range is the two numbers stated; "of proven claims" is the document's own denominator.

Fees and ratesAs stated in the filings

1 engagement · 1 firmErnst & Young Inc., 7 Apr 2019 – 5 Jun 2026Motion Record (Part 1) · 22 Jun 2026

FirmPeriodHoursFeesRatesSource
Ernst & Young Inc.Receiver7 Apr 2019 – 5 Jun 2026•••not statedMotion Record (Part 1) · 22 Jun 2026

3 stated figures across 1 engagement, each sourced

Subscribe

Already a subscriber? Sign in.

Documents
65 filings
DateDocumentFile
Discharge and Distribution Order, dated June 22, 2026
  • Presiding officer Justice Kimmel
PDF · Subscribers
Endorsement of Kimmel, J., dated June 22, 2026
  • Presiding officer Justice Kimmel
PDF · Subscribers
Motion Record (Part 1), returnable June 22, 2026
  • Recovery outcome Entries: per unstated; per unstated · Stated on: 2026-06-12 · Table missing:
  • Fee schedule Subscribers
PDF · Subscribers
Motion Record (Part 2), returnable June 22, 2026PDF · Subscribers
Notice of Motion, returnable June 22, 2026
  • Counsel Thornton Grout Finnigan LLP
  • Recovery outcome Entries: per unstated · Stated on: 2026-06-12 · Table missing:
PDF · Subscribers
Factum of the Receiver, dated June 16, 2026
  • Counsel Thornton Grout Finnigan LLP
PDF · Subscribers
Third Report of the Receiver (Part 1), dated June 12, 2026
  • Recovery outcome Entries: per actual; per unstated · Stated on: 2026-06-12 · Table missing:
PDF · Subscribers
Third Report of the Receiver (Part 2), dated June 12, 2026PDF · Subscribers
Endorsement of Penny, J., dated June 28, 2024
  • Presiding officer Justice Penny
PDF · Subscribers
Responding Motion Record, dated May 30, 2024
  • Counsel Thornton Grout Finnigan LLP
PDF · Subscribers
Motion Record of Spay, Inc. - Part 1, dated May 16, 2024PDF · Subscribers
Motion Record of Spay, Inc. - Part 2, dated May 16, 2024PDF · Subscribers
Trustee's Preliminary Report to the Creditors, dated February 23, 2024
  • Recovery outcome Entries: per estimated; per estimated · Stated on: 2024-02-23 · Table missing:
PDF · Subscribers
Creditors' PackagePDF · Subscribers
Certificate of AppointmentPDF · Subscribers
Statement of Defence of Spay, Inc. dated June 23, 2023PDF · Subscribers
Statement of Claim, dated May 17, 2023PDF · Subscribers
Endorsement of Penny, J
  • Presiding officer Justice Penny
PDF · Subscribers
SPay Order
  • Presiding officer Justice Penny
PDF · Subscribers
Motion Record of the Respondent, returnable March 2, 2022PDF · Subscribers
Book of Authorities of the Moving Party/Respondent, SPay IncPDF · Subscribers
Compendium of the Court-Appointed Receiver, dated February 18, 2022PDF · Subscribers
Responding Factum of the Receiver, dated February 18, 2022
  • Counsel Thornton Grout Finnigan LLP
PDF · Subscribers
Factum of SPay, Inc. dated February 4, 2022
  • Counsel Lax O'Sullivan Lisus Gottlieb LLP
PDF · Subscribers
Reasons for Decision - Court of Appeal Heard November 12, 2021 released November 18, 2021PDF · Subscribers
Motion Record of the Respondent SPay, Inc. - Part 1, dated June 30, 2021
PDF · Subscribers
Motion Record of the Respondent SPay, Inc. - Part 2, dated June 30, 2021PDF · Subscribers
Notice of Motion returnable on a date to be scheduled following a Case Conference 2 Second Report of Ernst & Young Inc., in its capacity as Receiver and Manager of Mundo Media Ltd. et al. dated May 10, 2021 Appendix “A” Appointment Order dated April 9, 2019 Appendix “B” U.S. Recognition Order dated July 11, 2019 Appendix “C” Maintenance & Support Agreement dated July 7, 2017 between Mundo and Stack Media Appendix “D” Statement of Account for transactions with Stack Appendix “E” Outstanding Invoices Appendix “F” March 2017 Invoice Appendix “G” Blue Star Sports Press Release issued July 10, 2017 Appendix “H” Email correspondence between Palazzo and a representative of Mundo on July 12, 2017 Appendix “I” Sample emails regarding invoices for May 2017, July 2017 and March 2018 Appendix “J” June 2017 and March 2018 Mundo bank transaction history extracts Appendix “K” Asset Purchase Agreement between Stack Media, Inc. and SPay Inc. dated May 2, 2017 (completed on or about June 13, 2017) Appendix “L” Publisher Agreement dated July 7, 2017 between Mundo and SPay Inc. Appendix “M” Statement of Account for transactions with SPay Inc. Appendix “N” Timeline setting out Mundo and SPay invoices and payments Appendix “O” Amended Verified Complaint (U.S. Litigation by SPay Inc. against Nick Palazzo, among others) 3 Draft Order Directing PaymentPDF · Subscribers
The purpose of this Second Report is to provide this Court with information with respect to this receivership proceeding and in support of the Receiver’s request that the Court grant an Order: (a) approving this Second Report and the activities of the Receiver as described herein; and (b) declaring that SPay, Inc. (“SPay”) is liable to pay to the Receiver the amount of $4,124,000 with respect to unpaid accounts for services rendered by Mundo prior to the Appointment Order and directing that this amount be paid forthwithPDF · Subscribers
Compendium of the RespondentPDF · Subscribers
Factum of the Receiver
  • Counsel Thornton Grout Finnigan LLP
PDF · Subscribers
Appeal Book and CompendiumPDF · Subscribers
Appellant's Factum of Vdopia Inc
  • Counsel Clark Farb Fiksel LLP
PDF · Subscribers
Exhibit Book
PDF · Subscribers
Order re Distribution and Direction of Payment dated
  • Presiding officer Justice Hainey
PDF · Subscribers
Endorsement of Hainey, J., dated November 6, 2020
  • Presiding officer Justice Hainey
PDF · Subscribers
Supplementary Responding Factum of Vdopia Inc
  • Counsel Clark Farb Fiksel LLP
PDF · Subscribers
The Receiver filed its First Report to the Court dated September 22, 2020 (the “First Report”) in support of a motion for the Court’s assistance in obtaining payment of the Vdopia Receivable (as defined below). The Receiver is filing this Supplement to the First Report (the “Supplement”) to provide the Court with further information in respect of the receivable owing to AppThis Holdings from Vdopia Inc. in the amount of approximately $373,731.23 (the “Vdopia Receivable”) pursuant to certain invoices issued under an agreement between Vdopia Inc. and AppThis LLC (“AppThis”) dated November 7, 2017, as detailed in the First Report. This Supplement is filed to provide the Court with information in response to an issue raised by Vdopia Inc. (for the first time) in its Factum filed on October 23, 2020 for this motionPDF · Subscribers
Responding Factum of Vdopia
  • Counsel Clark Farb Fiksel LLP
PDF · Subscribers
Ernst & Young Inc., in its capacity as court-appointed receiver and manager (the “Receiver”) of Mundo Media Ltd. (“Mundo Media”) and the other Respondents hereto (collectively, “Mundo”), seeks an Order directing Vdopia Inc. (“Vdopia”) to pay to the Receiver the amount of USD$373,731.23 with respect to unpaid accounts for services rendered to it prior to the Appointment OrderPDF · Subscribers
1 Notice of Motion returnable October 2, 2020 2 First Report of Ernst & Young Inc., in its capacity as Receiver and Manager of Mundo Media Ltd. et al. dated September 22, 2020 Appendix “A” Appointment Order dated April 9, 2019 Appendix “B” U.S. Recognition Order dated July 11, 2019 Appendix “C” Interim Statement of Receipts and Disbursements Appendix “D” Vdopia Chocolate Marketplace Agreement for Advertisers and Publishers dated on or about November 7, 2017 Appendix “E” AppThis Unpaid Invoices Appendix “F” Commercial Arbitration Rules Demand For Arbitration Appendix “G” Response filed by Vdopia Inc. in the Arbitration Appendix “H” Answer to the Response fled by AppThis LLC in the Arbitration Appendix “I” Boldscreen Media LLC documentation regarding AppThis/Vdopia traffic Appendix “J” Letter from Arbitrator regarding Notice of Stay filed by AppThis in the Arbitration 3 Draft OrderPDF · Subscribers
Endorsement of Hainey, J., dated October 2, 2020
  • Presiding officer Justice Hainey
PDF · Subscribers
The purpose of this First Report is to provide this Court with information with respect to this receivership proceeding and in support of the Receiver’s request that the Court grant an Order: (a) approving this First Report and the activities of the Receiver as described herein; and (b) directing Vdopia Inc. (“Vdopia”) to pay to the Receiver the amount of $373,731.23 with respect to an unpaid account for services rendered by Mundo prior to the Appointment Order
PDF · Subscribers
JudgmentPDF · Subscribers
245 - 246 Notice - 2307521 Ontario IncPDF · Subscribers
245 - 246 Notice - 2518769 Ontario IncPDF · Subscribers
245 - 246 Notice - 2538853 Ontario LtdPDF · Subscribers
245 - 246 Notice - 36 Labs, LLCPDF · Subscribers
245 - 246 Notice - Active Signal Marketing, LLCPDF · Subscribers
245 - 246 Notice - AppThis Holdings, IncPDF · Subscribers
245 - 246 Notice - Find Click Engage, LLCPDF · Subscribers
245 - 246 Notice - Fli Digital, IncPDF · Subscribers
245 - 246 Notice - M Zone Marketing IncPDF · Subscribers
245 - 246 Notice - Mogenio S.APDF · Subscribers
245 - 246 Notice - Movil Wave S.a.r.lPDF · Subscribers
245 - 246 Notice - Mundo IncPDF · Subscribers
245 - 246 Notice - Mundo Media (Luxembourg) S.a.r.lPDF · Subscribers
245 - 246 Notice - Mundo Media (US), LLCPDF · Subscribers
245 - 246 Notice - Mundo Media LtdPDF · Subscribers
Endorsement of Pattilo, J
  • Presiding officer Justice Pattilo
PDF · Subscribers
Receivership Order
  • Commencement date 9 April 2019
  • Counsel Thornton Grout Finnigan LLP
  • Court ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST)
  • Court file no CV-19-00617777-00CL
PDF · Subscribers
Application Record, - Part 1PDF · Subscribers
Application Record, - Part 2PDF · Subscribers
Application Record, - Part 3PDF · Subscribers
Prefiling Report of the ReceiverPDF · Subscribers

Filing titles and dates are public, and so is each filing's own page. The figures read from them are for subscribers.

CiteProceedings., “Mundo Media Ltd” (Receivership (court-appointed)), Ontario Superior Court of Justice · Commercial List. Retrieved 21 September 2026, https://proceedings.ca/case/mundo-media-ltd

Sources last checked · summary updated 9 August 2026 · Report a correction · Printed from proceedings.ca/case/mundo-media-ltd

Facts and summaries are extracted automatically from the court filings linked on each page; the filings remain the authoritative record. Suggested corrections are reviewed against the source filings.