Proceedings.

Ann-Maura Developments Inc

ClosedFollow
Proceeding
Interim receivershipSubsection 47 (1) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. B-3, as amended 9the ("BIA") and section 101 of the Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990 c. C43, as amended the ("CJA")
Industry
Real estate
Filings held2
Last activity20 Oct 2009
Ask in plain language. The answer comes only from this case’s filings, each one cited.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for a new line
Open this case in Proceedings AI⁠Save your chats, keep long conversations going, and ask across every case.
Case updates2 dated entries
Parties

Debtor

Ann-Maura Developments Inc

Interim receiver

Zeifmans

Bench and counselPer the orders and service lists on the record

Bench

JudgeCourtOn this docketCases on record
Justice Wilton-SiegelOntario Superior Court of Justice2 orders, Mar 2009 – Oct 2009111 cases on record

Counsel of record

PartyCounselFirst seenSource
CreditorZeifman Partners IncBorden Ladner Gervais LLP20 Oct 2009Order · 20 Oct 2009
RecoveriesAs stated in the filings

Closed · the record states no distribution outcome.

Documents2 filings
DateDocumentFile
Discharge Order
  • Counsel Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Presiding officer Justice Wilton-Siegel
PDF · Subscribers
Court Order
  • Presiding officer Justice Wilton-Siegel
  • Proceeding type interim_receivership
  • Statutory basis Subsection 47 (1) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. B-3, as amended 9the ("BIA") and section 101 of the Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990 c. C43, as amended the ("CJA")
PDF · Subscribers

Filing titles and dates are public, and so is each filing's own page. The figures read from them are for subscribers.

CiteProceedings., “Ann-Maura Developments Inc” (Interim receivership). Retrieved 4 November 2026, https://proceedings.ca/case/ann-maura-developments-inc

Sources last checked · record updated 11 August 2026 · Report a correction · Printed from proceedings.ca/case/ann-maura-developments-inc

Facts and summaries are extracted automatically from the court filings linked on each page; the filings remain the authoritative record. Suggested corrections are reviewed against the source filings.