Skope Energy
Follow- Proceeding
- CCAACompanies' Creditors Arrangement Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36, as amended
- File
- 1201-14864
Skope Energy is under Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act protection. On 27 November 2012 the Court of King's Bench of Alberta granted an order under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act in respect of Skope Energy Partners, Skope Energy Inc. and Skope Energy International Inc. (court file 1201-14864), with Ernst & Young Inc. as monitor. The list of creditors records total secured claims of $53,452,544.00, owed to Pine Cliff Energy Ltd.; the largest unsecured claim is that of Full Cycle Energy Investment Management Limited at $2,964,873.82.
A claims procedure has been established — see the order for deadlines.
Per the Order - Claims Procedure dated 27 November 2012.
The officer filed report no. Second Report. Skope continues to operate its non-operated oil and gas interests while pursuing a CCAA Plan of Arrangement backed by Pine Cliff, having found that sale bids from the SISP were insufficient to repay secured debt; the Monitor's forecast indicates Skope will have sufficient cash to meet obligations through February 28, 2013.
Source: 2. Second Report of the Monitor
8 earlier updates, back to 27 November 2012 — subscribers.
Debtor
Skope Energy
Monitor
EY
| Priority class | Creditor | Amount | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Secured | Pine Cliff Energy Ltd. · in 4 casesTotal Secured Creditors as reported ($53,452,544.00) — debtor: Skope Partners, Skope Energy Inc. and Skope Energy International Inc. · as of 27 Nov 2012 | $53.5M | Skope Creditor Listing as at |
Unsecured creditors: paid in full.Under the plan2. Second Report of the Monitor · 9 Jan 2013
| Class | Creditor | Claims | Recovery | Basis | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unsecured | Unsecured Creditors (six creditors with claims $5,000 or less) | — | paid in full | Under the planper the monitor | 2. Second Report of the Monitor · 9 Jan 2013 |
Each row is one filing's statement, copied as it reads and never computed. "Estimated" is the officer's forecast; "Under the plan" is the plan's or proposal's own term; "Final" is a declared or paid distribution; a row with no chip states no footing. A range is the two numbers stated; "of proven claims" is the document's own denominator.
Cash on hand
$1M
As at 9 Jan 20132. Second Report of the Monitor
| Date | Document | File |
|---|---|---|
| Order - Creditors' Meeting Order | PDF · Subscribers | |
2. Second Report of the Monitor
| PDF · Subscribers | |
| Order - Stay Extension | PDF · Subscribers | |
| 1. First Report of the Monitor | PDF · Subscribers | |
| 0. Report of the Proposed Monitor | PDF · Subscribers | |
Affidavit of Henry Cohen - Initial Application
| PDF · Subscribers | |
Application - Originating Application
| PDF · Subscribers | |
Order - Claims Procedure
| PDF · Subscribers | |
Order - Initial Order
| PDF · Subscribers | |
Skope Creditor Listing as at
| PDF · Subscribers | |
Filing titles and dates are public, and so is each filing's own page. The figures read from them are for subscribers.
CiteProceedings., “Skope Energy” (CCAA), Court of King's Bench of Alberta. Retrieved 20 September 2026, https://proceedings.ca/case/skope-energy