Proceedings.

Shoes.com Technologies Inc. and Shoeme Technologies Limited

ClosedFollow
Proceeding
Receivership (court-appointed)Section 243(1) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and Section 39 of the Law and Equity Act
File
S-171026
Filings held24
Last activity5 Nov 2018
On the record3,551 days
Ask in plain language. The answer comes only from this case’s filings, each one cited.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for a new line
Open this case in Proceedings AI⁠Save your chats, keep long conversations going, and ask across every case.
Case updates19 dated entries · 5 undated
#Order

The court appointed Alvarez & Marsal Canada Inc. as Receiver, on the application of Deans Knight Capital Management Ltd.. Court file S-171026.

Source: Receivership Order

Undated filings5 — no date appears on the document · show
—
Claims

Form 87 Notice and Statement of Receiver — Claims process approved

PDF · Subscribers

Parties

Debtor

Shoes.com Technologies Inc. and Shoeme Technologies Limited

Receiver

Alvarez & Marsal

Bench and counselPer the orders and service lists on the record

Counsel of record

PartyCounselFirst seenSource
DebtorShoes.com Technologies Inc. and Shoeme Technologies LimitedMichael, Evrensel & Pawar LLP19 Jun 2017Service list · 19 Jun 2017
CreditorBank of MontrealGowling WLG (Canada) LLP19 Jun 2017Service list · 19 Jun 2017
CreditorCaleres Investment Company, IncGowling WLG (Canada) LLP19 Jun 2017Service list · 19 Jun 2017
CreditorDaniel GerlerFasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP19 Jun 2017Service list · 19 Jun 2017
CreditorDeans Knight Capital ManagementMichael, Evrensel & Pawar LLP19 Jun 2017Service list · 19 Jun 2017
CreditorGeodisChaitons LLP19 Jun 2017Service list · 19 Jun 2017
CreditorJane Winkworth and French Sole LtdLacasse s.e.n.c.r.l.19 Jun 2017Service list · 19 Jun 2017
CreditorOswego Group, LLC d / b / a Inverness GroupGall Legge Grant and Munroe LLP19 Jun 2017Service list · 19 Jun 2017
CreditorRoger Hardy and Hardy Capital CorporationLawson Lundell LLP19 Jun 2017Service list · 19 Jun 2017
CreditorWal-Mart Stores, IncMcMillan LLP19 Jun 2017Service list · 19 Jun 2017
CreditorWells FargoBennett Jones LLP19 Jun 2017Service list · 19 Jun 2017
RecoveriesAs declared or paid

Unsecured creditors: a distribution. Caleres Investment Company, Inc. a distribution · Geodis Logistics LLC paid in full · Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. paid in full.EstimatedThird Report of the Receiver · 19 Jun 2017

ClassCreditorClaimsRecoveryBasisSource
Secured——Estimatedper the receiverThird Report of the Receiver · 19 Jun 2017
SecuredCaleres Investment Company, Inc.—interimFinalper the receiverNotice of Application · 19 Oct 2018
SecuredDeans Knight Capital Management Limited—interimFinalper the receiverNotice of Application · 19 Oct 2018
SecuredGeodis Logistics LLC—paid in fullinterimFinalper the receiverNotice of Application · 19 Oct 2018
SecuredWells Fargo Bank, N.A.—paid in fullFinalper the receiverNotice of Application · 19 Oct 2018
Unsecuredsubordinate secured creditors—Estimatedper the receiverThird Report of the Receiver · 19 Jun 2017

Each row is one filing's statement, copied as it reads and never computed. "Estimated" is the officer's forecast; "Under the plan" is the plan's or proposal's own term; "Final" is a declared or paid distribution; a row with no chip states no footing. A range is the two numbers stated; "of proven claims" is the document's own denominator.

5 blurred figures above

The claims and what each class or creditor recovers — each as the filing states it, with its source.

Start 5-day trial

Card required. Nothing charged for 5 days. Cancel anytime.

Already a subscriber? Sign in.

See all plans⁠
Documents
24 filings
DateDocumentFile
Discharge Order (November 5, 2018)PDF · Subscribers
Notice of Application
  • Recovery outcome Entries: per actual; per actual; per actual; per actual; per unstated · Table missing:
PDF · Subscribers
Affidavit No. 1 of M.VerbruggePDF · Subscribers
Fifth Report of the ReceiverPDF · Subscribers
Second Interim Distribution Order (January 16, 2018)PDF · Subscribers
Draft Distribution OrderPDF · Subscribers
Distribution Order (June 30, 2017)PDF · Subscribers
Service List
  • Counsel Michael, Evrensel & Pawar LLP
PDF · Subscribers
Approval and Vesting OrderPDF · Subscribers
Second Report of the ReceiverPDF · Subscribers
Affidavit No. 2 of Dillon CameronPDF · Subscribers
Affidavit No. 2 of Miriam DominguezPDF · Subscribers
Creditor listPDF · Subscribers
Receivership Order
  • Applicant Deans Knight Capital Management Ltd.
  • Appointee Alvarez & Marsal Canada Inc.
  • Appointee role Receiver
  • Commencement date 15 February 2017
  • + 3 more extracted facts
PDF · Subscribers
First Report of the ReceiverPDF · Subscribers
Affidavit #1 of Dillon CameronPDF · Subscribers
Affidavit #1 of Miriam DominguezPDF · Subscribers
Notice of Hearing of Petition returnable February 3, 2017PDF · Subscribers
Petition to the Court (February 2, 2017)PDF · Subscribers
Form 87 Notice and Statement of ReceiverPDF · Subscribers
Fourth Report of the Receiver
  • Recovery outcome Entries: per actual; per actual; per estimated; per unstated · Stated on: 2018-01-03 · Table missing:
PDF · Subscribers
Order Approving SalePDF · Subscribers
Order Made After ApplicationPDF · Subscribers
Third Report of the Receiver
  • Recovery outcome Entries: per actual; per unstated; per estimated; per unstated; per estimated · Stated on: 2017-06-19 · Table missing:
PDF · Subscribers

Filing titles and dates are public, and so is each filing's own page. The figures read from them are for subscribers.

CiteProceedings., “Shoes.com Technologies Inc. and Shoeme Technologies Limited” (Receivership (court-appointed)), Supreme Court of British Columbia. Retrieved 5 November 2026, https://proceedings.ca/case/shoes-com-technologies-inc-and-shoeme-technologies-limited

Sources last checked · record updated 31 August 2026 · Report a correction · Printed from proceedings.ca/case/shoes-com-technologies-inc-and-shoeme-technologies-limited

Facts and summaries are extracted automatically from the court filings linked on each page; the filings remain the authoritative record. Suggested corrections are reviewed against the source filings.