Proceedings.

Michael David Michaels

ActiveFollow
Proceeding
Receivership (court-appointed)BIA s. 243 / prov. Judicature Acts
Filings held4
Last activity22 Jan 2019
OverviewSummary updated

Michael David Michaels is the subject of insolvency proceedings in British Columbia, where the British Columbia Securities Commission applied to have Grant Thornton Limited appointed as receiver.

Claims processIf you are owed money

A claims procedure has been established — see the order for deadlines.

Per the Victoria Times Colonist - Notice of Claims Process - January 22, 2019.pdf dated 22 January 2019.

Ask in plain language. The answer comes only from this case’s filings, each one cited.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for a new line
Open this case in Proceedings AI⁠Save your chats, keep long conversations going, and ask across every case.
Case updates4 dated entries
Parties

Debtor

Michael David Michaels

Receiver

Doane Grant Thornton

Documents4 filings
DateDocumentFile
Victoria Times Colonist - Notice of Claims Process - January 22, 2019.pdfPDF · Subscribers
Message to Investors - January 17 2019.pdf
  • Appointee Grant Thornton Limited
  • Appointee role Receiver
PDF · Subscribers
Press Release - British Columbia Securities Commission.pdf
  • Appointee Grant Thornton Limited
  • Appointee role receiver
PDF · Subscribers
Michaels Claims Notice - FINAL.PDF
  • Applicant British Columbia Securities Commission
  • Appointee Grant Thornton Limited
  • Appointee role Receiver
  • Financial position Subscribers
  • + 3 more extracted facts
PDF · Subscribers

Filing titles and dates are public, and so is each filing's own page. The figures read from them are for subscribers.

CiteProceedings., “Michael David Michaels” (Receivership (court-appointed)). Retrieved 5 November 2026, https://proceedings.ca/case/michael-david-michaels

Sources last checked · summary updated 6 September 2026 · Report a correction · Printed from proceedings.ca/case/michael-david-michaels

Facts and summaries are extracted automatically from the court filings linked on each page; the filings remain the authoritative record. Suggested corrections are reviewed against the source filings.