Greata Ranch Developments Limited Partnership
Follow- Proceeding
- Receivership (court-appointed)Rule 10-2 of the Supreme Court Civil Rules, B.C. Reg 168/2009 and Section 39 of the Law and Equity Act, R.S.B.C. 1996 c. 253
- File
- S178380
Greata Ranch Developments Limited Partnership remains subject to active insolvency proceedings before the Supreme Court of British Columbia. Ernst & Young Inc. holds the appointment as receiver and manager of the limited partnership, and it is Ernst & Young, acting in that capacity, that stands as applicant in the matter before the court. The proceeding is ongoing in British Columbia, with the court process carried forward by the appointed officer.
8 earlier updates, back to 13 September 2017 — subscribers.
Debtor
Greata Ranch Developments Limited Partnership
Receiver
EY
Bench
| Judge | Court | On this docket | Cases on record |
|---|---|---|---|
| Justice Masuhara | Supreme Court of British Columbia | 1 order, Sep 2017 | 15 cases on record |
Counsel of record
| Party | Counsel | First seen | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ReceiverEY | McMillan LLP | 10 Jul 2018 | Service list · 10 Jul 2018 |
| Applicant | Bennett Jones LLP | 10 Jul 2018 | Service list · 10 Jul 2018 |
| DebtorGreata Ranch Developments Limited Partnership | Nathanson Schachter & Thompson LLP | 10 Jul 2018 | Service list · 10 Jul 2018 |
| Priority class | Creditor | Amount | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Secured | One West Holdings Ltd.One West Award - Arbitration Award counterclaim under Project Management Agreement, forming part of 'Prior Charges' — Related party (affiliate of Concord Partners); originally counterclaimed for $6,615,495.36, Arbitrator allowed award of $6,211,539 plus interest; part of Prior Charges not repaid from sale proceeds but included in purchase price under Settlement Agreement — debtor: Greata Ranch Developments Limited Partnership / Concord GP · as of 23 Jun 2017 | $6.21M | Receiver's Report |
This proceeding was commenced by a secured creditor. The record does not include the debtor’s own statement of assets and liabilities — that ceiling is the record’s, not this page’s.
No acceptable bid — The SSP did not result in a sale of the Property; further marketing efforts delayed.Receiver's Report · 28 Apr 2021
| Purchaser | Price | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prospective Buyer who submitted LOI/Updated LOI/New LOI, unnamedthe Property · real property | Subscribers | Not completed | Receiver's Report |
| Date | Document | File |
|---|---|---|
| Order Made After Application | PDF · Subscribers | |
Notice of Application
| PDF · Subscribers | |
Receiver's Report
| PDF · Subscribers | |
| Non-Disclosure Agreement | PDF · Subscribers | |
| Sales Teaser | PDF · Subscribers | |
Sales Process Order The sale and solicitation procedures in substantially the form described in Schedule “B” hereto (the “SSP”) are hereby approved, and the Receiver is authorized and directed to carry out the SSP in accordance with its terms and this Order and is hereby authorized and directed to take such steps as it considers necessary or desirable in canning out its obligations under the SSP
| PDF · Subscribers | |
First Report of the Receiver The purpose of this first report of the Receiver (the “First Report”) is to, among other things: a) provide the Supreme Court of Briitish Columbia with information pertaining to the: i. background of the Greata LP and these proceedings; ii. activities of the Receiver since the date of its appointment; iii. Receiver’s proposed sales process (the “Proposed Sales Process”) in respect of the Property; iv. receipts and disbursements of the Receiver to date; and v. the recommendations of the Receiver. b) seek an order of approving the: i. Proposed Sales Process for the Property, as described herein; ii. fees and expenses of the Receiver as outlined herein; iii. fees and expenses of the Receiver’s legal counsel as outlined herein; and iv. First Report and the activities of the Receiver to the date hereof and described herein
| PDF · Subscribers | |
Notice of Application re Sales Process Order ORDERS SOUGHT 1. An Order abridging the time for service such that this Application is properly returnable on July 17, 2018 and that service upon any interested party other than those parties on the service list maintained by the Receiver in this proceeding is hereby dispensed with. 2. An Order on substantially the terms attached as Schedule “B” regarding the proposed sale solicitation process described in Schedule “B” to the Order (the “SSP”). 3. An Order approving the Receiver’s First Report, including its activities and actions described therein. 4. An Order approving the fees and disbursements of the Receiver and of the Receiver’s legal counsel as set out in the Receiver’s First Report
| PDF · Subscribers | |
Order appointing Ernst & Young Inc. as receiver
| PDF · Subscribers | |
Affidavit of Matt Meehan re Petition to the Court appointing Ernst & Young Inc. as receiver
| PDF · Subscribers | |
| Petition to the Court appointing Ernst & Young Inc. as receiver of the property and business of the Greata Ranch Developments Limited Partnership | PDF · Subscribers | |
Filing titles and dates are public, and so is each filing's own page. The figures read from them are for subscribers.
CiteProceedings., “Greata Ranch Developments Limited Partnership” (Receivership (court-appointed)), Supreme Court of British Columbia. Retrieved 20 September 2026, https://proceedings.ca/case/greata-ranch-developments-limited-partnership