Proceedings.

Williams Telecommunications Corp.

ActiveFollow
Proceeding
Receivership (court-appointed)Section 243(1) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and Section 101 of the Courts of Justice Act
File
CV-22-00681036-00CL
Filings held8
Last activity14 Mar 2023
On the record1,631 days
OverviewSummary updated

Williams Telecommunications Corp. is in receivership under BIA s. 243, commenced on the application of Bank of Montreal as senior secured creditor, with the appointment order dated May 19, 2022. As at that date, BMO's secured claim stood at approximately $2 million, comprising an Operating Loan of approximately $1.7 million (75% guaranteed by Export Development Canada) and a HASCAP Loan of approximately $250,000 (guaranteed by the Business Development Bank of Canada). The Canada Revenue Agency holds deemed trust claims ranking ahead of the Bank's security: $25,055.53 in unremitted HST for February through April 2022, which the Receiver intends to reduce through an HST adjustment and an anticipated income tax refund before remitting, and $1,948.98 for unremitted payroll deductions, of which the $1,713.28 deemed trust portion has already been paid.

Ask in plain language. The answer comes only from this case’s filings, each one cited.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for a new line
Open this case in Proceedings AI⁠Save your chats, keep long conversations going, and ask across every case.
Case updates8 dated entries
#Report

The officer filed a report. The Company had already ceased operations before the receiver's appointment, and the Receiver liquidated remaining inventory and equipment through an online auction, collected accounts receivable, and is now completing final administrative and tax matters prior to seeking its discharge.

Source: Receiver’s First Report (for motion returnable March 14, 2023)

Parties

Debtor

Williams Telecommunications Corp.

Receiver

Albert Gelman

Bench and counselPer the orders and service lists on the record

Bench

JudgeCourtOn this docketCases on record
Justice SteeleOntario Superior Court of Justice2 orders, Mar 2023245 cases on record
Justice GilmoreOntario Superior Court of Justice2 orders, May 202268 cases on record

Counsel of record

PartyCounselFirst seenSource
ReceiverAlbert GelmanChaitons LLP14 Mar 2023Order · 14 Mar 2023
ApplicantBank of MontrealMiller Thomson LLP19 May 2022Order · 19 May 2022
Capital structureAs asserted in the filings
stated amounts, drawn to scale · for subscribers
#Priority classCreditorAmountSource
3Deemed trusts (CRA and other)Canada Revenue Agency · in 985 casesDeemed trust class claim for unremitted HST for February through April 2022. Ranks in priority to the Bank's security; Receiver intends to reduce/offset this claim via an HST adjustment for uncollectable receivables and an anticipated income tax refund before remitting payment; unpaid as of report date. — debtor: Williams Telecommunications Corp.$25.1KReceiver’s Interim Report dated September 8, 2022
3Deemed trusts (CRA and other)
4Secured

2 more claims in 2 classes The stack holds Deemed trusts (CRA and other) and Secured claims.

Every creditor and every amount, drawn to scale.

Start 5-day trial

Card required. Nothing charged for 5 days. Cancel anytime.

Already a subscriber? Sign in.

See all plans⁠

This proceeding was commenced by a secured creditor. The record does not include the debtor’s own statement of assets and liabilities — that ceiling is the record’s, not this page’s.

Fees and ratesAs stated in the filings

1 engagement · 1 firm — Albert Gelman Inc., incl. HSTMotion record · 2 Mar 2023

FirmPeriodHoursFeesRatesSource
Albert Gelman Inc.Receiver—Sought—not statedMotion record · 2 Mar 2023

1 blurred figure above

What the firm billed — each as the filing states it, with its source.

Start 5-day trial

Card required. Nothing charged for 5 days. Cancel anytime.

Already a subscriber? Sign in.

See all plans⁠
Estate financialsReported figures — never derived

Cumulative receipts

$322K

As at 16 Feb 2023Receiver’s First Report (for motion returnable March 14, 2023)

Cumulative disbursements

As at

Cash on hand

As at

Professional fees

As at

3 more reported figures

Each one as the filing states it, with its source.

Start 5-day trial

Card required. Nothing charged for 5 days. Cancel anytime.

Already a subscriber? Sign in.

See all plans⁠
Documents8 filings
DateDocumentFile
Endorsement of Justice Steele dated March 14, 2023
  • Presiding officer Justice Steele
PDF · Subscribers
Order of Justice Steele dated March 14, 2023
  • Counsel Chaitons LLP
  • Presiding officer Justice Steele
PDF · Subscribers
Motion record returnable March 14, 2023
PDF · Subscribers
Receiver’s First Report (for motion returnable March 14, 2023)
  • Cash on hand · Disbursements · Fee schedule · Financial position Subscribers
  • + 5 more extracted facts
PDF · Subscribers
Receiver’s Interim Report dated September 8, 2022
  • Financial position · Secured creditors · Unsecured creditors Subscribers
PDF · Subscribers
Endorsement of Justice Gilmore dated May 19, 2022
  • Presiding officer Justice Gilmore
PDF · Subscribers
Receivership Appointment Order dated May 19 2022
  • Applicant Bank of Montreal
  • Appointee Albert Gelman Inc.
  • Appointee role receiver and manager
  • Commencement date 19 May 2022
  • + 6 more extracted facts
PDF · Subscribers
Application Record returnable May 19, 2022
  • Applicant BANK OF MONTREAL
  • Commencement date 12 May 2022
  • Court SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST)
  • Court file no CV-22-00681036-00CL
  • + 2 more extracted facts
PDF · Subscribers

Filing titles and dates are public, and so is each filing's own page. The figures read from them are for subscribers.

CiteProceedings., “Williams Telecommunications Corp.” (Receivership (court-appointed)), Ontario Superior Court of Justice. Retrieved 4 November 2026, https://proceedings.ca/case/williams-telecommunications-corp

Sources last checked · summary updated 13 August 2026 · Report a correction · Printed from proceedings.ca/case/williams-telecommunications-corp

Facts and summaries are extracted automatically from the court filings linked on each page; the filings remain the authoritative record. Suggested corrections are reviewed against the source filings.