Proceedings.

Richmond Hill Re-Dev Corporation

ClosedFollow
Proceeding
Receivership (court-appointed)section 243(1) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and section 101 of the Courts of Justice Act
File
CV-23-00695238-00CL
Filings held13
Last activity23 Sep 2024
On the record1,277 days
Ask in plain language. The answer comes only from this case’s filings, each one cited.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for a new line
Open this case in Proceedings AI⁠Save your chats, keep long conversations going, and ask across every case.
Case updates13 dated entries
Parties

Debtor

Richmond Hill Re-Dev Corporation

Receiver

RSM Canada

Bench and counselPer the orders and service lists on the record

Bench

JudgeCourtOn this docketCases on record
Justice SteeleOntario Superior Court of Justice4 orders, Mar 2023 – May 2023245 cases on record
Justice ConwayOntario Superior Court of Justice2 orders, Sep 2024310 cases on record
Justice PennyOntario Superior Court of Justice2 orders, Mar 2023196 cases on record

Counsel of record

PartyCounselFirst seenSource
ReceiverRSM CanadaChaitons LLP23 Sep 2024Order · 23 Sep 2024
ApplicantChaitons LLP8 May 2023Order · 8 May 2023
RecoveriesAs stated in the filings

Closed · the record states no distribution outcome.

Fees and ratesAs stated in the filings

1 engagement · 1 firm — TDB Restructuring Limited, 1 Jun 2023 – 30 Jun 2024Motion Record of the Receiver · 10 Sep 2024

FirmPeriodHoursFeesRatesSource
TDB Restructuring LimitedReceiver1 Jun 2023 – 30 Jun 2024Sought——Motion Record of the Receiver · 10 Sep 2024

1 blurred figure above

What the firm billed — each as the filing states it, with its source.

Start 5-day trial

Card required. Nothing charged for 5 days. Cancel anytime.

Already a subscriber? Sign in.

See all plans⁠
Documents
13 filings
DateDocumentFile
Ancillary Relief and Discharge Order dated September 23, 2024
  • Counsel Chaitons LLP
  • Presiding officer Justice Conway
PDF · Subscribers
Endorsement of Justice Conway dated September 23, 2024
  • Presiding officer Justice Conway
PDF · Subscribers
First Report of the Receiver dated September 10, 2024
PDF · Subscribers
Motion Record of the Receiver returnable September 23, 2024
  • Applicant EMPIRICAL CAPITAL CORP.
  • Appointee TDB Restructuring Limited
  • Appointee role Receiver
  • Commencement date 10 September 2024
  • + 3 more extracted facts
PDF · Subscribers
Notice and Statement of Receiver dated May 17, 2023PDF · Subscribers
Appointment Order dated May 8, 2023
  • Applicant Empirical Capital Corp.
  • Appointee RSM Canada Limited
  • Appointee role receiver
  • Commencement date 8 May 2023
  • + 6 more extracted facts
PDF · Subscribers
Endorsement of Justice Steele dated May 8, 2023
  • Presiding officer Justice Steele
PDF · Subscribers
Endorsement of Justice Steele dated May 1, 2023
  • Presiding officer Justice Steele
PDF · Subscribers
Endorsement of Justice Penny dated March 16, 2023
  • Presiding officer Justice Penny
PDF · Subscribers
Endorsement of Justice Penny dated March 13, 2023
  • Presiding officer Justice Penny
PDF · Subscribers
Endorsement of Justice Steele dated March 8, 2023
  • Presiding officer Justice Steele
PDF · Subscribers
Application Record dated February 24, 2023
  • Applicant EMPIRICAL CAPITAL CORP.
  • Commencement date 24 February 2023
  • Court SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST)
  • Court file no CV-23-00695238-00CL
  • + 1 more extracted fact
PDF · Subscribers
Service List dated February 24, 2023PDF · Subscribers

Filing titles and dates are public, and so is each filing's own page. The figures read from them are for subscribers.

CiteProceedings., “Richmond Hill Re-Dev Corporation” (Receivership (court-appointed)), Ontario Superior Court of Justice. Retrieved 4 November 2026, https://proceedings.ca/case/richmond-hill-re-dev-corporation

Sources last checked · record updated 24 August 2026 · Report a correction · Printed from proceedings.ca/case/richmond-hill-re-dev-corporation

Facts and summaries are extracted automatically from the court filings linked on each page; the filings remain the authoritative record. Suggested corrections are reviewed against the source filings.