Proceedings.

Natural Energy Systems Inc. in Receivership

ClosedFollow
Proceeding
Receivership (court-appointed)BIA s. 243 / prov. Judicature Acts
File
CV-20-00649326-00CL
Filings held22
Last activity31 May 2021
On the record2,149 days
OverviewSummary updated

Natural Energy Systems Inc. has been the subject of a court-appointed receivership in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, commenced on December 17, 2020 under section 243 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and provincial Judicature Act authority. The matter proceeded on the Commercial List of the Superior Court of Justice in Ontario under court file number CV-20-00649326-00CL. The proceeding is closed.

Ask in plain language. The answer comes only from this case’s filings, each one cited.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for a new line
Open this case in Proceedings AI⁠Save your chats, keep long conversations going, and ask across every case.
Case updates22 dated entries
#Order

Order placed Natural Energy Systems Inc. into court-appointed receivership, commencing the proceeding on the Commercial List under court file CV-20-00649326-00CL.

Source: Continuing Receivership Order

Parties

Debtor

Natural Energy Systems Inc. in Receivership

Receiver

Baigel Corp.

Bench and counselPer the orders and service lists on the record

Bench

JudgeCourtOn this docketCases on record
Justice KoehnenOntario Superior Court of Justice3 orders, Nov 2020 – Feb 202183 cases on record
Justice HaineyOntario Superior Court of Justice2 orders, May 2021211 cases on record

Counsel of record

PartyCounselFirst seenSource
ApplicantBennett Jones LLP17 Dec 2020Order · 17 Dec 2020
CreditorDouglas HallettLittle & Bonham LLP27 Nov 2020Factum · 27 Nov 2020
RecoveriesAs stated in the filings

Closed · the record states no distribution outcome.

Documents
22 filings
DateDocumentFile
Approval and Vesting Order
  • Presiding officer Justice Hainey
PDF · Subscribers
Endorsement of Justice HaineyPDF · Subscribers
Receiver’s Discharge Order
  • Presiding officer Justice Hainey
PDF · Subscribers
Motion Record of the Receiver – Returnable 31 May 2021
PDF · Subscribers
Receiver’s Factum – for Receiver’s motion returnable 31 May 2021PDF · Subscribers
Third Report of the Receiver (without appendices)PDF · Subscribers
Endorsement of Justice Koehnen
  • Presiding officer Justice Koehnen
PDF · Subscribers
Receiver’s Factum – for Receiver’s motion returnable 10 February 10 2021PDF · Subscribers
SISP Approval Order
  • Presiding officer Justice Koehnen
PDF · Subscribers
Motion Record of the Receiver – Returnable 10 February 2021PDF · Subscribers
Second Report of the Receiver (without appendices)PDF · Subscribers
Continuing Receivership Order
  • Commencement date 17 December 2020
  • Counsel Bennett Jones LLP
  • Court SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST)
  • Court file no CV-20-00649326-00CL
PDF · Subscribers
Endorsement of Justice Dietrich
  • Presiding officer Justice Dietrich
PDF · Subscribers
First Report of the ReceiverPDF · Subscribers
Factum of the Applicant – Reply to Factum of Douglas J. HallettPDF · Subscribers
Factum of Douglas J. Hallett
  • Counsel Little & Bonham LLP
PDF · Subscribers
Reply Affidavit of Dr. Dragan MatovicPDF · Subscribers
Notice and Statement of Receiver (s. 245(1) and 246(1) of the BIA )PDF · Subscribers
Motion Record of Douglas J. HallettPDF · Subscribers
Interim Appointment Order
  • Presiding officer Justice Koehnen
PDF · Subscribers
Notice of Appearance of counsel to Douglas J. HallettPDF · Subscribers
Factum of the ApplicantPDF · Subscribers

Filing titles and dates are public, and so is each filing's own page. The figures read from them are for subscribers.

CiteProceedings., “Natural Energy Systems Inc. in Receivership” (Receivership (court-appointed)), Ontario Superior Court of Justice. Retrieved 4 November 2026, https://proceedings.ca/case/natural-energy-systems-inc-in-receivership

Sources last checked · summary updated 19 August 2026 · Report a correction · Printed from proceedings.ca/case/natural-energy-systems-inc-in-receivership

Facts and summaries are extracted automatically from the court filings linked on each page; the filings remain the authoritative record. Suggested corrections are reviewed against the source filings.