Proceedings.

Intertainment Media Inc.

Follow
Active
Proceeding
NOIBIA s. 50.4
Filings held16
Last activity1 Mar 2017

Early record. This matter is tracked from the court registry; its linked filings are the record, and extracted facts will appear here as its documents are processed. Still to come: a written summary; the stage tracker; capital structure; assets; estate financials; the sale process.

Case updates9 dated entries · 7 undated

6 earlier updates subscribers.

Undated filings7 — no date appears on the document · show

7 filings carry no date on their face — subscribers.

Parties

Debtor

Intertainment Media Inc.

Proposal trustee

GlassRatner

Documents
16 filings
DateDocumentFile
Court Order approving Sales Process, dated March 1, 2017Trustee site
Endorsement of Court Order approving Sales Process, dated March 1, 2017Trustee site
Court Order approving extension of time to file a Proposal, dated February 27, 2017Trustee site
Endorsement of Court Order approving extension of time to file a Proposal, dated February 27, 2017Trustee site
Motion Record returnable February 24, 2017Trustee site
Second Report of Proposal TrusteeTrustee site
Court Order re: DIP Financing, dated February 14, 2017Trustee site
Motion Record returnable February 14, 2017Trustee site
First Report of Proposal TrusteeTrustee site
Certificate of Filing a Notice of Intention to Make a ProposalTrustee site
Confidentiality AgreementTrustee site
Intertainment Confidentiality AgreementTrustee site
Intertainment Opportunity TeaserTrustee site
NOI Creditors PackageTrustee site
Notice of Proposal Package to CreditorsTrustee site
Stalking Horse APATrustee site

Filing titles and dates are public, and so is each filing's own page. The figures read from them are for subscribers.

CiteProceedings., “Intertainment Media Inc.” (NOI). Retrieved 20 September 2026, https://proceedings.ca/case/intertainment-media-inc

Sources last checked · record updated 16 August 2026 · Report a correction · Printed from proceedings.ca/case/intertainment-media-inc

Facts and summaries are extracted automatically from the court filings linked on each page; the filings remain the authoritative record. Suggested corrections are reviewed against the source filings.