Proceedings.

International Conduits Ltd

ActiveFollow
Proceeding
Receivership (court-appointed)section 47(1) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. B-3, as amended (the "BIA") and section 101 of the Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O 1990 c. C.43, as amended (the "CJA")
File
08-CL-7394
Filings held7
Last activity8 Jul 2009
On the record6,842 days
OverviewSummary updated

International Conduits Ltd is subject to insolvency proceedings in which a receiver has been administering claims from multiple creditors. CIT Financial Ltd, described as the senior secured lender under secured loan facilities, issued a demand and a Notice of Intention to Enforce Security under section 244 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act. A default judgment obtained by GMB Installations Inc., asserting a non-possessory lien under the Repair and Storage Lien Act, was set aside by consent order, leaving the validity and amount of that claim to be determined, with the receiver reserving funds pending resolution. Disputed unsecured claims include one from NTD Precision Ltd., settled at $45,000 to allow disputed components into an auction, and one from MHR Hydraulics Limited for $18,020, which the receiver declined to pursue. Universal Security Instruments Inc., ICL's majority shareholder and a guarantor on the CIT loan, is also named as an unsecured creditor.

Ask in plain language. The answer comes only from this case’s filings, each one cited.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for a new line
Open this case in Proceedings AI⁠Save your chats, keep long conversations going, and ask across every case.
Case updates7 dated entries
#Report

The officer filed report no. Second Report. ICL's inventory and fixed assets have all been sold via private sale and public auction, the Receiver has vacated the ICL premises, and remaining work involves collecting residual receivables, resolving the GMB lien claim, and winding down the receivership.

Source: Court Report – September 09, 2008

Parties

Debtor

International Conduits Ltd

Receiver

Zeifmans

Bench and counselPer the orders and service lists on the record

Bench

JudgeCourtOn this docketCases on record
Justice PepallOntario Superior Court of Justice2 orders, Feb 2008 – Jul 200922 cases on record

Counsel of record

PartyCounselFirst seenSource
ApplicantMiller Thomson LLP11 Feb 2008Order · 11 Feb 2008
CreditorZEIFMAN PARTNERS INCTorkin Manes Cohen Arbus LLP25 Jun 2008Order · 25 Jun 2008
Capital structureAs asserted in the filings
#Priority classCreditorAmountSource
4SecuredGMB Installations Inc.Non-possessory lien under the Repair and Storage Lien Act (RSLA), per default judgment (Snowie Judgment) dated January 29, 2008 — Snowie Judgment set aside by consent order (Tab 7); validity and quantum of lien claim remain unresolved and to be determined in receivership; Receiver reserving funds pending determination — debtor: International Conduits Ltd.—Court Report – June 12, 2008
4Secured
8Unsecured
8Unsecured
8Unsecured

4 more claims in 2 classes The stack holds Secured and Unsecured claims.

Every creditor and every amount.

Start 5-day trial

Card required. Nothing charged for 5 days. Cancel anytime.

Already a subscriber? Sign in.

See all plans⁠

“not stated” means the record names the claim without a figure; “—” means not in the extracted record.

This proceeding was commenced by a secured creditor. The record does not include the debtor’s own statement of assets and liabilities — that ceiling is the record’s, not this page’s.

RecoveriesAs stated in the filings

CIT Financial Ltd.: shortfall.EstimatedCourt Report – September 09, 2008 · 9 Sep 2008

ClassCreditorClaimsRecoveryBasisSource
SecuredCIT Financial Ltd.—short by Estimatedper the receiverCourt Report – September 09, 2008 · 9 Sep 2008

Each row is one filing's statement, copied as it reads and never computed. "Estimated" is the officer's forecast; "Under the plan" is the plan's or proposal's own term; "Final" is a declared or paid distribution; a row with no chip states no footing. A range is the two numbers stated; "of proven claims" is the document's own denominator.

1 blurred figure above

The claims and what each class or creditor recovers — each as the filing states it, with its source.

Start 5-day trial

Card required. Nothing charged for 5 days. Cancel anytime.

Already a subscriber? Sign in.

See all plans⁠
Estate financialsReported figures — never derived

Professional fees

$54.4K

As at 31 Aug 2008Court Report – September 09, 2008

Documents7 filings
DateDocumentFile
Court Order – July 08, 2009
  • Presiding officer Justice Pepall
PDF · Subscribers
Court Order – September 22, 2008PDF · Subscribers
Court Report – September 09, 2008
  • Operational summary ICL's inventory and fixed assets have all been sold via private sale and public auction, the Receiver has vacated the ICL premises, and remaining work involves collecting residual receivables, resolving the GMB lien claim, and winding down the receivership.
  • Cash on hand · Disbursements · Financial position Subscribers
  • + 5 more extracted facts
PDF · Subscribers
Court Order – July 30, 2008PDF · Subscribers
Court Order – June 25, 2008
  • Counsel Torkin Manes Cohen Arbus LLP
PDF · Subscribers
Court Report – June 12, 2008
  • Applicant CIT FINANCIAL LTD.
  • Appointee Zeifman Partners Inc.
  • Appointee role Interim Receiver
  • Commencement date 11 February 2008
  • + 4 more extracted facts
PDF · Subscribers
Court Order – February 11, 2008
  • Applicant CIT FINANCIAL LTD.
  • Appointee Zeifman Partners Inc.
  • Appointee role interim receiver and receiver
  • Commencement date 11 February 2008
  • + 7 more extracted facts
PDF · Subscribers

Filing titles and dates are public, and so is each filing's own page. The figures read from them are for subscribers.

CiteProceedings., “International Conduits Ltd” (Receivership (court-appointed)), Ontario Superior Court of Justice. Retrieved 5 November 2026, https://proceedings.ca/case/international-conduits-ltd

Sources last checked · summary updated 13 August 2026 · Report a correction · Printed from proceedings.ca/case/international-conduits-ltd

Facts and summaries are extracted automatically from the court filings linked on each page; the filings remain the authoritative record. Suggested corrections are reviewed against the source filings.