Proceedings.

Evoke Developments Ottawa GP Corp. and Evoke Developments Ottawa, LP

ClosedFollow
Proceeding
Receivership (court-appointed)section 243(1) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and section 101 of the Courts of Justice Act
File
CV-24-00095400-0000
Industry
Real estate
Filings held15
Last activity22 Oct 2025
On the record898 days
Ask in plain language. The answer comes only from this case’s filings, each one cited.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for a new line
Open this case in Proceedings AI⁠Save your chats, keep long conversations going, and ask across every case.
Case updates15 dated entries
Parties

Debtor

Evoke Developments Ottawa GP Corp. and Evoke Developments Ottawa, LP

Receiver

Alvarez & Marsal

Bench and counselPer the orders and service lists on the record

Bench

JudgeCourtOn this docketCases on record
Justice MacLeodOntario Superior Court of Justice3 orders, Mar 202522 cases on record
Justice WilliamsOntario Superior Court of Justice2 orders, Jul 20242 cases on record
Justice RogerOntario Superior Court of Justice2 orders, May 20243 cases on record

Counsel of record

PartyCounselFirst seenSource
ReceiverAlvarez & MarsalChaitons LLP2 Jul 2024Service list · 2 Jul 2024
ApplicantDickinson Wright LLP21 May 2024Order · 21 May 2024
ApplicantStarbank Developments 2000 CorpDickinson Wright LLP2 Jul 2024Service list · 2 Jul 2024
RecoveriesAs stated in the filings

Closed · the record states no distribution outcome.

Fees and ratesAs stated in the filings

1 engagement · 1 firm — Alvarez & Marsal Canada Inc., to 30 Nov 2024Second Report of the Receiver · 20 Jan 2025

FirmPeriodHoursFeesRatesSource
Alvarez & Marsal Canada Inc.Receiverto 30 Nov 2024Sought—Second Report of the Receiver · 20 Jan 2025

2 blurred figures above

What the firm billed — each as the filing states it, with its source.

Start 5-day trial

Card required. Nothing charged for 5 days. Cancel anytime.

Already a subscriber? Sign in.

See all plans⁠
Documents
15 filings
DateDocumentFile
Receiver’s Discharge Certificate (October 22, 2025)PDF · Subscribers
Receiver’s Certificate (March 28, 2025)PDF · Subscribers
Approval and Vesting Order signed by Justice MacLeod (March 18, 2025)
  • Presiding officer Justice MacLeod
PDF · Subscribers
Distribution and Discharge Order signed by Justice MacLeod (March 18, 2025)
  • Presiding officer Justice MacLeod
PDF · Subscribers
Endorsement of Justice MacLeod (March 18, 2025)
  • Presiding officer Justice MacLeod
PDF · Subscribers
Motion Record Returnable March 18, 2025
  • Counsel Chaitons LLP
PDF · Subscribers
Second Report of the Receiver
PDF · Subscribers
Endorsement of Justice Williams (July 25, 2024)
  • Presiding officer Justice Williams
PDF · Subscribers
Sale Process Approval Order signed by Justice Williams (July 25, 2024)
  • Presiding officer Justice Williams
PDF · Subscribers
First Report of the ReceiverPDF · Subscribers
Motion Record returnable July 25, 2024PDF · Subscribers
Service List
  • Counsel Chaitons LLP
PDF · Subscribers
Endorsement of Justice Roger (May 21, 2024)
  • Presiding officer Justice Roger
PDF · Subscribers
Receivership Appointment Order (May 21, 2024)
  • Applicant STARBANK DEVELOPMENTS 2000 CORP.
  • Appointee Alvarez & Marsal Canada Inc.
  • Appointee role receiver and manager
  • Commencement date 21 May 2024
  • + 6 more extracted facts
PDF · Subscribers
Application Record (April 25, 2024)PDF · Subscribers

Filing titles and dates are public, and so is each filing's own page. The figures read from them are for subscribers.

CiteProceedings., “Evoke Developments Ottawa GP Corp. and Evoke Developments Ottawa, LP” (Receivership (court-appointed)), Ontario Superior Court of Justice. Retrieved 4 November 2026, https://proceedings.ca/case/evoke-developments-ottawa-gp-corp-and-evoke-developments-ottawa-lp

Sources last checked · record updated 31 August 2026 · Report a correction · Printed from proceedings.ca/case/evoke-developments-ottawa-gp-corp-and-evoke-developments-ottawa-lp

Facts and summaries are extracted automatically from the court filings linked on each page; the filings remain the authoritative record. Suggested corrections are reviewed against the source filings.