Proceedings.

Dallata Consulting Group Ltd. and Akram Hamid (collectively “the Debtors”)

ClosedFollow
Proceeding
Receivership (court-appointed)Section 243(1) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. B-3, as amended (the “BIA”) and Section 101 of the Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C-43, as amended (the “CJA”)
File
CV-13-10040-00CL
Filings held12
Last activity29 May 2014
On the record4,985 days
OverviewSummary updated

Dallata Consulting Group Ltd. and Akram Hamid, together the Debtors, were placed into a court-appointed receivership commenced on March 13, 2013 in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Commercial List, under court file number CV-13-10040-00CL. The appointment rests on the dual authority ordinarily invoked for receiverships in Ontario: section 243(1) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. B-3, as amended, and section 101 of the Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C-43, as amended. The proceeding, which extends to both the corporate debtor and the individual debtor, is closed.

Ask in plain language. The answer comes only from this case’s filings, each one cited.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for a new line
Open this case in Proceedings AI⁠Save your chats, keep long conversations going, and ask across every case.
Case updates12 dated entries
Parties

Debtor

Dallata Consulting Group Ltd. and Akram Hamid (collectively “the Debtors”)

Receiver

Deloitte

Bench and counselPer the orders and service lists on the record

Bench

JudgeCourtOn this docketCases on record
Justice MorawetzOntario Superior Court of Justice8 orders, Mar 2013 – Jun 2013141 cases on record

Counsel of record

PartyCounselFirst seenSource
ReceiverDeloitteThornton Grout Finnigan LLP21 Jun 2013Order · 21 Jun 2013
ApplicantThornton Grout Finnigan LLP21 Jun 2013Order · 21 Jun 2013
ApplicantHSBC Bank CanadaThornton Grout Finnigan LLP13 Mar 2013Order · 13 Mar 2013
RecoveriesAs stated in the filings

Closed · the record states no distribution outcome.

Documents
12 filings
DateDocumentFile
Discharge Order
  • Counsel Thornton Grout Finnigan LLP
PDF · Subscribers
Endorsement of Wilton-Siegel J.
  • Counsel Thornton Grout Finnigan LLP
  • Presiding officer Justice Wilton-Siegel
PDF · Subscribers
Second Report of the ReceiverPDF · Subscribers
Endorsement of Morawetz J.
  • Presiding officer Justice Morawetz
PDF · Subscribers
Order - Morawetz, J. (relief sought by Bank
  • Counsel Thornton Grout Finnigan LLP
  • Presiding officer Justice Morawetz
PDF · Subscribers
Order- Morawetz, J. (relief sought by Receiver)
  • Counsel Thornton Grout Finnigan LLP
  • Presiding officer Justice Morawetz
PDF · Subscribers
Typewritten of Endorsement of Morawetz, J.
  • Presiding officer Justice Morawetz
PDF · Subscribers
First Report of the ReceiverPDF · Subscribers
Endorsement of Morawetz, J. - Scheduling (March 15, 2013)
  • Presiding officer Justice Morawetz
PDF · Subscribers
Endorsement of Morawetz, J. (March 13, 2013)
  • Presiding officer Justice Morawetz
PDF · Subscribers
Initial Order - Dallata (March 13, 2013)
  • Commencement date 13 March 2013
  • Counsel Thornton Grout Finnigan LLP
  • Court SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST
  • Court file no CV-13-10040-00CL
  • + 4 more extracted facts
PDF · Subscribers
Initial Order - Hamid (March 13, 2013)
  • Counsel Thornton Grout Finnigan LLP
  • Presiding officer Justice Morawetz
PDF · Subscribers

Filing titles and dates are public, and so is each filing's own page. The figures read from them are for subscribers.

CiteProceedings., “Dallata Consulting Group Ltd. and Akram Hamid (collectively “the Debtors”)” (Receivership (court-appointed)), Ontario Superior Court of Justice. Retrieved 4 November 2026, https://proceedings.ca/case/dallata-consulting-group-ltd-and-akram-hamid-collectively-the-debtors

Sources last checked · summary updated 19 August 2026 · Report a correction · Printed from proceedings.ca/case/dallata-consulting-group-ltd-and-akram-hamid-collectively-the-debtors

Facts and summaries are extracted automatically from the court filings linked on each page; the filings remain the authoritative record. Suggested corrections are reviewed against the source filings.