Proceedings.

C&J Energy

Follow
Active
Proceeding
Foreign recognition (CCAA)The Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act, R.S.C. 1985, C.C-36 as amended (the "CCAA"), as amended, including but not limited to Part IV thereof.
File
1601-08740
Filings held54
Last activity10 Jul 2018
On the record3,708 days
Secured debtSubscribers
OverviewSummary updated

C&J Energy is the subject of insolvency proceedings before the Court of King's Bench of Alberta under court file number 1601-08740, on the application of C&J Energy Production Services-Canada Ltd. The proceeding commenced on July 27, 2016. Ernst & Young Inc. is the appointed Information Officer. The proceeding is active.

Claims processIf you are owed money

A claims procedure has been established — see the order for deadlines.

Proceedings AIAsk this case — answers cite the filings
Ask in plain language. The answer comes only from this case’s filings, each one cited.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for a new line
Case updates54 dated entries

51 earlier updates, back to 27 July 2016 subscribers.

Parties

Debtor

C&J Energy

Information officer

EY

Bench and counselPer the orders and service lists on the record

Bench

JudgeCourtOn this docketCases on record
Justice NixonCourt of King's Bench of Alberta3 orders, Jul 2016 – Jan 201736 cases on record
Justice YamauchiCourt of King's Bench of Alberta2 orders, Oct 2016 – Jul 201828 cases on record

Counsel of record

PartyCounselFirst seenSource
CreditorAdministrative agentBorden Ladner Gervais LLP27 Jul 2016Service list · 27 Jul 2016
Capital structureAs asserted in the filings
Priority classCreditorAmountSource
SecuredSecured Lenders (Credit Agreement) · in 2 casesas of Plan/Disclosure Statement projected claims — Credit Agreement obligations (plus any unpaid fees, expenses and other obligations under the Credit Agreement) — Class 4 Secured Lender Claims under Plan; projected amount of claims, estimate only and subject to change; C&J Canada and MDT are guarantors of this debt — debtor: C&J Energy (CJ Holding Company et al., including C&J Canada and MDT as guarantors)$1.39B USDSecond Report Information Officer, filed

3 more claims across lower-ranking classes

Subscribe

Already a subscriber? Sign in.

RecoveriesAs stated in the filings

Unsecured creditors: a distribution.Under the plan · sanctionedOrder, filed · 21 Dec 2016

ClassCreditorClaimsRecoveryBasisSource
SecuredMineral Contractor Claims (Class 3)a distributionUnder the plansanctionedper the monitorSecond Report Information Officer, filed · 19 Dec 2016
UnsecuredUnsecured Convenience Class Claims (Class 5)a distributionconditionalUnder the plansanctionedper the courtOrder, filed · 21 Dec 2016

Each row is one filing's statement, copied as it reads and never computed. "Estimated" is the officer's forecast; "Under the plan" is the plan's or proposal's own term; "Final" is a declared or paid distribution; a row with no chip states no footing. A range is the two numbers stated; "of proven claims" is the document's own denominator.

2 stated figures across 2 outcomes, each sourced

Subscribe

Already a subscriber? Sign in.

Fees and ratesAs stated in the filings

2 engagements · 1 firmlatest: Ernst & Young Inc., to 13 Jan 2017Third Report of the Information Officer, filed · 13 Jan 2017

FirmPeriodHoursFeesRatesSource
Ernst & Young Inc.Information officerperiod 2 of 2to 13 Jan 2017Sought•••••••••2 peopleThird Report of the Information Officer, filed · 13 Jan 2017
Ernst & Young Inc.Information officerperiod 1 of 2to 18 Nov 2016Sought•••••••••5 peopleThird Report of the Information Officer, filed · 13 Jan 2017

36 stated figures across 2 engagements, each sourced

Subscribe

Already a subscriber? Sign in.

Documents
54 filings
DateDocumentFile
Order (Recognition of Objection Order), filed
  • Presiding officer Justice K. Yamauchi
PDF · Subscribers
Bench Brief of the Applicant, filedPDF · Subscribers
Fourth Report of the Information Officer, filed - Part 1PDF · Subscribers
Fourth Report of the Information Officer, filed - Part 2
PDF · Subscribers
Information Officer's Certificate, filedPDF · Subscribers
Order (Approval of Information Officer's Accounts), filed
  • Presiding officer Justice D. B. Nixon
PDF · Subscribers
Third Report of the Information Officer, filed
PDF · Subscribers
Application, returnable
  • Applicant C&J ENERGY PRODUCTION SERVICES-CANADA LTD.
  • Appointee Ernst & Young Inc.
  • Appointee role Information Officer
  • Court COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH OF ALBERTA
  • + 3 more extracted facts
PDF · Subscribers
Order, filed
  • Presiding officer Justice D. B. Nixon
  • Recovery outcome Entries: per plan; per plan; per plan · Table missing:
PDF · Subscribers
Brief of the Applicant, filedPDF · Subscribers
Exhibit 1PDF · Subscribers
Exhibit 10PDF · Subscribers
Exhibit 11PDF · Subscribers
Exhibit 12PDF · Subscribers
Exhibit 13PDF · Subscribers
Exhibit 2PDF · Subscribers
Exhibit 3PDF · Subscribers
Exhibit 4PDF · Subscribers
Exhibit 5PDF · Subscribers
Exhibit 6PDF · Subscribers
Exhibit 7PDF · Subscribers
Exhibit 8PDF · Subscribers
Exhibit 9PDF · Subscribers
Fifth Affidavit of Mark Cashiola, swornPDF · Subscribers
Second Report Information Officer, filed
  • Recovery outcome Entries: per plan; per plan · Stated on: 2016-12-19 · Table missing:
  • Financial position · Secured creditors · Unsecured creditors Subscribers
PDF · Subscribers
13. Confirmation Order, granted
  • Recovery outcome Entries: per plan; per plan; per plan; per unstated · Table missing:
PDF · Subscribers
04. Order, filed
  • Presiding officer Justice C. Jones
PDF · Subscribers
Bench Brief of the Applicant, C&J Energy, filed (Part 1 of 2)PDF · Subscribers
Bench Brief of the Applicant, C&J Energy, filed (Part 2 of 2)PDF · Subscribers
Affidavit of Service of Robert Rotman, swornPDF · Subscribers
First Report of the Information Officer, filed
  • Financial position · Secured creditors · Unsecured creditors Subscribers
PDF · Subscribers
Fourth Affidavit of Mark Cashiola, swornPDF · Subscribers
Affidavit of Robert Rotman, swornPDF · Subscribers
Proof of ClaimPDF · Subscribers
03. Order, filed
  • Presiding officer Justice K. D. Yamauchi
PDF · Subscribers
Application filed
  • Applicant C&J ENERGY PRODUCTION SERVICES-CANADA LTD.
  • Court COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH OF ALBERTA
  • Court file no 1601-08740
  • Statutory basis section 46 of the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36, as amended
PDF · Subscribers
11. Final DIP Financing Order, grantedPDF · Subscribers
12. Bar Date Order, grantedPDF · Subscribers
CJE Notice to Creditors - EYI Information Officer
  • Financial position · Secured creditors · Unsecured creditors Subscribers
PDF · Subscribers
02. Order, filedPDF · Subscribers
01. Order, filed
  • Presiding officer Justice D. B. Nixon
PDF · Subscribers
Affidavit of Mark Cashiola, swornPDF · Subscribers
Application, filed
  • Applicant C&J Energy Production Services-Canada Ltd.
  • Commencement date 27 July 2016
  • Court COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH OF ALBERTA
  • Court file no 1601-08740
  • + 2 more extracted facts
PDF · Subscribers
Letter to Service List
  • Counsel Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
PDF · Subscribers
06. Interim DIP Financing Order, grantedPDF · Subscribers
01. Foreign Representative Order, grantedPDF · Subscribers
02. Interim Cash Collateral Order, grantedPDF · Subscribers
03. Taxes Order, grantedPDF · Subscribers
04. Wages Order, grantedPDF · Subscribers
05. Insurance Order, grantedPDF · Subscribers
07. Lienholder's Order, grantedPDF · Subscribers
08. Interim Cash Management Order, grantedPDF · Subscribers
09. Utilities Order, grantedPDF · Subscribers
10. Critical Vendors Order, grantedPDF · Subscribers

Filing titles and dates are public, and so is each filing's own page. The figures read from them are for subscribers.

CiteProceedings., “C&J Energy” (Foreign recognition (CCAA)), Court of King's Bench of Alberta. Retrieved 20 September 2026, https://proceedings.ca/case/c-j-energy

Sources last checked · summary updated 24 August 2026 · Report a correction · Printed from proceedings.ca/case/c-j-energy

Facts and summaries are extracted automatically from the court filings linked on each page; the filings remain the authoritative record. Suggested corrections are reviewed against the source filings.