Proceedings.

1621985 Ontario Inc.

Follow
Closed
Proceeding
Receivership (court-appointed)section 243(1) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and section 101 of the Courts of Justice Act
File
CV-15-10880-00CL
Filings held7
Last activity25 May 2015
On the record4,232 days
Proceedings AIAsk this case — answers cite the filings
Ask in plain language. The answer comes only from this case’s filings, each one cited.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for a new line
Case updates7 dated entries · 1 undated
#Order

The court appointed The Fuller Landau Group Inc. as receiver, on the application of Business Development Bank of Canada. Court file CV-15-10880-00CL.

Source: Appointment Order

Undated filings1 — no date appears on the document · show
Filing

RESPONDING RECORD OF BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT BANK OF CANADA Application filed

PDF

Parties

Debtor

1621985 Ontario Inc.

Receiver

Fuller Landau

Bench and counselPer the orders and service lists on the record

Counsel of record

PartyCounselFirst seenSource
ApplicantSimpsonWigle LAW LLP19 Feb 2015Order · 19 Feb 2015
RecoveriesAs stated in the filings

Closed · the record states no distribution outcome.

Documents7 filings
DateDocumentFile
Approval and Vesting OrderPDF
Discharge OrderPDF
Judge’s EndorsementPDF
Motion Record (returnable May 25 2015)PDF
1st Report of Receiver. May 14 2015PDF
Appointment Order
  • Applicant Business Development Bank of Canada
  • Appointee The Fuller Landau Group Inc.
  • Appointee role receiver
  • Commencement date 19 February 2015
  • + 5 more extracted facts
PDF
RESPONDING RECORD OF BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT BANK OF CANADAPDF

Filing titles, dates, and extracted key facts are public.

CiteProceedings., “1621985 Ontario Inc.” (Receivership (court-appointed)), Ontario Superior Court of Justice. Retrieved 20 September 2026, https://proceedings.ca/case/1621985-ontario-inc

Sources last checked · record updated 22 August 2026 · Report a correction · Printed from proceedings.ca/case/1621985-ontario-inc

Facts and summaries are extracted automatically from the court filings linked on each page; the filings remain the authoritative record. Suggested corrections are reviewed against the source filings.