Proceedings.

What the professionals charged

3,597 bills from 234 firms on 874 matters · 9,084 stated hourly rates · as the filings state them

The rate ladder, drawn to scaleThe ladder

CAD · standard rates · drawn at 12 or more

Each bar runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile of the stated standard hourly rates in the band, with the median marked — the bar and its three figures are for subscribers. One observation per person per rate, Canadian dollars, undiscounted, on matters with no recognition proceeding.A band with fewer than 12 observations draws nothing.

The rate ladder is drawn for subscribers — the 25th, median and 75th percentile of 9,084 stated hourly rates, band by band. The bands and their counts are open to everyone.

Subscribe

Already a subscriber? Sign in.

Clear filters
125 of 25 stated rates · Aird & Berlis LLP
PersonFirmCasePeriodRate Source
D. R. EnglishAird & Berlis LLPReceiver's counselHolistic BlendON · closedto 27 Aug 2019•••First Report of the Receiver December 18, 2019
D. Robb Englishcalled 1980Aird & Berlis LLPReceiver's counselHolistic BlendON · closedto 31 Jul 2019•••First Report of the Receiver December 18, 2019
D. R. Englishcalled 1980Aird & Berlis LLPReceiver's counselDistinct Infrastructure Group Inc. et alON26 Feb – 5 Apr 2019•••Motion Record of the Receiver - Returnable May 3, 2019.pdf
Steven L. Graffcalled 1991Aird & Berlis LLPReceiver's counselDistinct Infrastructure Group Inc. et alON26 Feb – 5 Apr 2019•••Motion Record of the Receiver - Returnable May 3, 2019.pdf
Paul V. McCallencalled 1977Aird & Berlis LLPReceiver's counselDistinct Infrastructure Group Inc. et alON26 Feb – 5 Apr 2019•••Motion Record of the Receiver - Returnable May 3, 2019.pdf
Trent HorneAird & Berlis LLPReceiver's counselHolistic BlendON · closedto 27 Aug 2019•••First Report of the Receiver December 18, 2019
Jill Frasercalled 1996Aird & Berlis LLPReceiver's counselDistinct Infrastructure Group Inc. et alON26 Feb – 5 Apr 2019•••Motion Record of the Receiver - Returnable May 3, 2019.pdf
Michael F. Horvatcalled 1999Aird & Berlis LLPReceiver's counselDistinct Infrastructure Group Inc. et alON26 Feb – 5 Apr 2019•••Motion Record of the Receiver - Returnable May 3, 2019.pdf
Faruk Gaficcalled 2008Aird & Berlis LLPReceiver's counselDistinct Infrastructure Group Inc. et alON26 Feb – 5 Apr 2019•••Motion Record of the Receiver - Returnable May 3, 2019.pdf
Kathryn A. Esawcalled 2010Aird & Berlis LLPReceiver's counselDistinct Infrastructure Group Inc. et alON26 Feb – 5 Apr 2019•••Motion Record of the Receiver - Returnable May 3, 2019.pdf
Kyle B. Plunkettcalled 2011Aird & Berlis LLPReceiver's counselHolistic BlendON · closedto 27 Nov 2019•••First Report of the Receiver December 18, 2019
Kyle B. PlunkettAird & Berlis LLPReceiver's counselHolistic BlendON · closedto 27 Sep 2019•••First Report of the Receiver December 18, 2019
Kyle B. PlunkettAird & Berlis LLPReceiver's counselHolistic BlendON · closedto 27 Aug 2019•••First Report of the Receiver December 18, 2019
Kyle B. Plunkettcalled 2011Aird & Berlis LLPReceiver's counselHolistic BlendON · closedto 31 Jul 2019•••First Report of the Receiver December 18, 2019
Kyle B. Plunkettcalled 2011Aird & Berlis LLPReceiver's counselDistinct Infrastructure Group Inc. et alON26 Feb – 5 Apr 2019•••Motion Record of the Receiver - Returnable May 3, 2019.pdf
Jeremy T. Nemerscalled 2014Aird & Berlis LLPReceiver's counselHolistic BlendON · closedto 27 Nov 2019•••First Report of the Receiver December 18, 2019
Jeremy T. NemersAird & Berlis LLPReceiver's counselHolistic BlendON · closedto 27 Sep 2019•••First Report of the Receiver December 18, 2019
Jeremy T. NemersAird & Berlis LLPReceiver's counselHolistic BlendON · closedto 27 Aug 2019•••First Report of the Receiver December 18, 2019
Jeremy T. Nemerscalled 2014Aird & Berlis LLPReceiver's counselHolistic BlendON · closedto 31 Jul 2019•••First Report of the Receiver December 18, 2019
Shannon MorrisBanking Clerk · counsel · clerkAird & Berlis LLPReceiver's counselHolistic BlendON · closedto 31 Jul 2019•••First Report of the Receiver December 18, 2019
Shannon MorrisAird & Berlis LLPReceiver's counselDistinct Infrastructure Group Inc. et alON26 Feb – 5 Apr 2019•••Motion Record of the Receiver - Returnable May 3, 2019.pdf
Shakaira Johncalled 2017Aird & Berlis LLPReceiver's counselDistinct Infrastructure Group Inc. et alON26 Feb – 5 Apr 2019•••Motion Record of the Receiver - Returnable May 3, 2019.pdf
Jenaya E. McLeanAird & Berlis LLPReceiver's counselHolistic BlendON · closedto 31 Jul 2019•••First Report of the Receiver December 18, 2019
Jonathan YantziAird & Berlis LLPReceiver's counselDistinct Infrastructure Group Inc. et alON26 Feb – 5 Apr 2019•••Motion Record of the Receiver - Returnable May 3, 2019.pdf
Jenaya E. McLeanAird & Berlis LLPReceiver's counselDistinct Infrastructure Group Inc. et alON26 Feb – 5 Apr 2019•••Motion Record of the Receiver - Returnable May 3, 2019.pdf

What a bill looks likeBenchmarks

Measured across the record

A partner's hour

•••

median of each bill's top standard rate, 2026, over 178 bills; 195 in 2025

The blended rate, stated

•••

median of the average hourly rates filings state outright, counsel, over 945 bills. A further 74 bills state fees and hours and no rate; that quotient is kept as its own series and never mixed in.

Counsel by year of call

•••

median standard rate by years since call — 0-4 years (224), 5-9 years (151), 10-19 years (212), 20+ years (264)

Where the rates are

3,597 bills

monitor 591 · receiver 1,013 · interim receiver 38 · trustee 64 · …

Who bills these estatesWho bills

Named in the filings
  1. KSV Restructuring Inc.Information officer · Interim receiver · Monitor · Proposal trustee · Receiver · Trustee · 108 matters354
  2. Deloitte Restructuring Inc.Interim receiver · Liquidator · Monitor · Proposal trustee · Receiver · Trustee · 64 matters191
  3. MNP Ltd.Interim receiver · Liquidator · Monitor · Proposal trustee · Receiver · Trustee · 96 matters182
  4. FTI Consulting Canada Inc.Information officer · Monitor · Receiver · 49 matters181
  5. Ernst & Young Inc.Information officer · Monitor · Proposal trustee · Receiver · 42 matters136
  6. Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLPCounsel · 45 matters129
  7. BDO Canada LimitedInterim receiver · Liquidator · Monitor · Proposal trustee · Receiver · Trustee · 68 matters122
  8. Aird & Berlis LLPCounsel · 61 matters103
  9. Alvarez & Marsal Canada Inc.Information officer · Liquidator · Monitor · Proposal trustee · Receiver · 41 matters91
  10. PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc.Information officer · Monitor · Proposal trustee · Receiver · Trustee · 30 matters74
  11. Grant Thornton LimitedInterim receiver · Monitor · Proposal trustee · Receiver · Trustee · 35 matters67
  12. Dentons Canada LLPCounsel · 31 matters62

Bills, counted one per firm per period however many filings restate it. 234 firms appear in the record; these are the 12 with the most.

How to read thisMethod

The frame. Every figure here comes from a fee affidavit, a passing of accounts, a motion record or an officer's report that a court file holds — fees that were filed for approval, which skews to the larger, longer and more contested mandates. It is not a survey of all insolvency work.

The series. The ladder and the tiles use standard hourly rates of named people, in Canadian dollars, on bills with no courtesy discount and on matters with no recognition proceeding. Discounted bills, stated averages and the rare bill that states fees and hours but no rate are kept as separate series and never mixed in. Nothing is drawn from fewer than 12 observations.

What it is not. A court does not test a bill by hours × rate; it asks what value was delivered (Bank of Nova Scotia v. Diemer, 2014 ONCA 851). This page shows what comparable mandates charged, never what a bill should have been. The record holds sixteen Québec fee documents and no French rate tables; it is not a benchmark for Québec.

Every fact carries its document. Each bill and each rate links to the filing that states it; each benchmark cell can be traced to the rates it was computed from through the rates view.

Facts and summaries are extracted automatically from the court filings linked on each page; the filings remain the authoritative record. Suggested corrections are reviewed against the source filings.