The 72 town homes at 5505–5585 Oak Street in Vancouver stand on about 139,000 square feet in the Shaughnessy/Oakridge neighbourhood, and they are rented to third parties. When Trez Capital Limited Partnership approved a $44,211,000 first mortgage loan to Shawn Oaks Holdings Ltd. and Landmark Shawn Oaks Development Ltd. in December 2019, the commitment letter described four two-storey wood-frame apartment buildings, security over 62 of their 72 strata units, and a borrower that "intends to acquire the remaining units in the Parent Property over the term of the loan and eventually redevelop the site to its highest and best use," per the Affidavit #1 of C. Skogen, Dec. 18, 2024, para. 7 and Ex. "A", p. 1. The site is a "Unique Site" in the Cambie Corridor, and the proposal made under the City of Vancouver's enhanced rezoning process contemplated a 31-storey strata tower, a 33-storey strata tower, a six-storey building with approximately 180 social housing units and a one-storey, 37-space childcare facility, per the same affidavit, paras. 9–10. A formal rezoning application was never submitted, according to the First Report of the Receiver, July 13, 2026, para. 4.2.
The Trez loan grew to $67,661,000 under a third amending agreement dated July 22, 2021. Peterson Investment Group Inc. lent a further $25,000,000 on a commitment letter of December 20, 2021, secured by a mortgage, an assignment of rents and a general security agreement, and a priority agreement of February 4, 2022 among Peterson, Trez and the debtors ranks the Trez security first. Landmark Premiere Properties Ltd., which holds 30% of the shares of Landmark Shawn Oaks Development, and Helen Chan Sun, its sole shareholder, guaranteed both loans. Both matured on September 1, 2024, and neither was repaid, per the First Report of the Receiver, July 13, 2026, paras. 4.3–4.11 and the Affidavit #1 of C. Skogen, Dec. 18, 2024, para. 4.
TCC Mortgage Holdings Inc., Trez's agent and nominee, petitioned for a receiver in December 2024 on the affidavit of Christian Skogen, Trez's chief risk officer, who deposed that nothing had been paid on the loan since October 7, 2024, that rents of $1,539,134 reported over the ten months to May 31, 2024 had not been remitted against the debt, and that, with no substantive updates from the debtors in six to eight weeks, "The available conclusion is that the rezoning process has indefinitely stalled." Peterson, which Trez understood to be owed $26,928,391.74 at December 1, 2024, supported the appointment, per the Affidavit #1 of C. Skogen, Dec. 18, 2024, paras. 8, 12, 15–16. The guarantors fought it on several fronts: a property manager was already collecting the rents, they said, and $450,000 paid to Trez between August 7 and October 7, 2024 had come from those rents; the petitioner was "seeking to circumvent the foreclosure process and a six-month redemption period"; and they had a listing proposal from CBRE and wanted the property sold outside any receivership. They asked that Mr. Skogen's paragraphs on the rezoning be struck as "wildly speculative, inflammatory and improper," per the Application Response of Helen Chan Sun and Landmark Premiere Properties Ltd., Jan. 17, 2025, Part 4, paras. 11, 13, 15–16; Part 5, paras. 10, 27.
Justice Wolfe heard the application, brought under s. 243(1) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and s. 39 of the Law and Equity Act, on January 24, 2025, took further submissions on February 13, and that day appointed Alvarez & Marsal Canada Inc. receiver of the lands and the personal property connected with them, per the Receivership Order, Feb. 13, 2025, pp. 1–2, para. 1. Judgments followed against the debtors and the guarantors: $74,374,751.44 for Trez on March 13, 2025, with per diem interest of $30,400.50 from March 14, and $28,781,874.09 for Peterson on April 14, 2025, with per diem interest of $17,536.85 from March 20, per the First Report of the Receiver, July 13, 2026, paras. 4.7, 4.10.
Nineteen confidentiality agreements, one tour
The receiver took proposals from three brokerages and, after consulting Trez and Peterson, retained Colliers Macaulay Nicolls Inc., which listed the lands on April 2, 2025 without a price, "to encourage outreach from interested parties so that the Listing Agent could gauge market feedback and provide potential buyers pricing guidance on a discretionary basis," per the First Report of the Receiver, July 13, 2026, paras. 5.2–5.3. Colliers' marketing report of July 6, 2026 sets out what followed: an MLS e-blast to 905 commercial brokers, e-blasts to 4,700 developers and investors in April and June 2025 and again in January 2026, a Facebook and Instagram campaign that logged 44,229 impressions, an advertisement in Insolvency Insider, direct calls to 50 companies and contacts, and presentations at the Toronto Real Estate Forum in December 2025 and ICSC in January 2026. Nineteen parties signed confidentiality agreements, among them Brookfield, Cressey, Grosvenor, Wesgroup and Northchild. Northchild Group was the only one to tour the site, in August 2025, and after completing its economic analysis it declined to make an offer, citing its attention to other offerings that had undergone significant price reductions, per the First Report of the Receiver, July 13, 2026, App. "A", pp. 1–5.
Colliers puts the absence of offers down to the development-land market: "Changes to housing policy, lack of optimism regarding absorption and end sale or lease values, significant existing inventory both built and under construction, construction costs and availability of capital have led to a material shift in the market," per the First Report of the Receiver, July 13, 2026, App. "A", p. 4. The Unique Site designation under the Cambie Corridor Plan, it adds, "creates an additional layer of uncertainty with regards to future use and the time required to work through the rezoning and entitlements process." Many of today's site buyers want cash flow from existing improvements, Colliers says, and Shawn Oaks has rental income. "However, the annual income does not support a purchase price high enough to allow for recovery by the various stakeholders," per the First Report of the Receiver, July 13, 2026, App. "A", p. 4. The receiver's own summary is that after more than 15 months on the market no offer had been submitted, owing to a slowdown in the land and development market and a saturated market for residential units. Over the same period it collected $1,367,000 in net rent, per the First Report of the Receiver, July 13, 2026, paras. 5.5, 8.1.
The lender's bid, and August 12
The first offer came from the lender's side. TC Shawn Oaks FC Limited Partnership, an affiliate of Trez, signed a subscription agreement on July 3, 2026 to take all the shares of Landmark Shawn Oaks Development for $62.5 million, "payable by assumption of the Trez Secured Indebtedness with the remaining amount outstanding under the loan to be an obligation of ResidualCo and a continuing obligation of the Guarantors." The structure was a reverse vesting order: new shares to the purchaser, the existing shares cancelled without consideration, and the excluded liabilities sent to a new subsidiary, per the First Report of the Receiver, July 13, 2026, paras. 5.6, 5.8–5.9. The receiver's application, filed July 21 and returnable August 12 before Justice Fitzpatrick, was plain about the second mortgage: "The Transaction will not yield any recovery for Peterson or other stakeholders, and the Debtors have no other assets once the Lands are sold," per the Notice of Application, July 21, 2026, Part 2, paras. 24–28. A second application, filed July 28, asked to discharge the receiver on the filing of its certificate, with further fees estimated at approximately $50,000 for the receiver and $60,000 for its counsel, Dentons Canada LLP, per the Notice of Application re Discharge Order, July 28, 2026, Part 1, para. 1. Colliers, for its part, had proposed to re-market the property with the offer's price published, to "aid in bringing competing offers forward in court," per the First Report of the Receiver, July 13, 2026, App. "A", p. 5.
Keep reading with a 5-day free trial
About 4 more minutes of this analysis, and 2 more sections. Every fact in it cites the filing it was read from.
Card required. Nothing charged for 5 days. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Sign in.
See all plans